The act was buy cialis online 32 passed Saturday, Sep 30. It prohibits online gambling by placing criminal sanctions on financial institutions and banks if online amoxil they online cheap ampicillin fund an entity involved in "illegal gambling" operations. Some things such as horseracing and fantasy cheap Without Prescription Ampicillin online buy gambling, Online Levitra buy Soft but common games such as poker and Buy strattera online blackjack are hit.
I will admit my bias and say that Ampicillin cheap online cialis lasix Kamagra jelly price without prescription this legislation is crap. order online levitra antibiotic sildenafil citrate href=”http://cytotecbuyonline.com”>cheap levitra online cytotec levaquin The government should not be telling us what we can and buy Buy Viagra amoxil viagra female cannot do with our own money. They say it’s to protect the children and to stop best viagra online gambling addictions… can Brand Levitra you buy cialis tablets href=”http://amoxil-pills.net”>online amoxil buy Buy Plavix Online Pharmacy No Prescription Needed clomid online there are many other less restrictive yet more effective means to protect children from gambling websites such as universal age-verification accounts (which could be implemented if the government amoxicillin buy Provigil pharmacy levitra drugs looked into regulation instead of buy Viagra online jelly”>Kamagra jelly online diflucan prohibition). As propecia buy penicillin brand for addicts…. I’ve never heard an addict complain that he couldn’t find a place to gamble his money away. Taking this away doesn’t help the addiction
I agree with you that this is an unnecessary and unhelpful bill. If legally prohibiting addictive behaviors was effective, then alcohol would be the least abused drug in America. Instead, it’s the most where do you buy viagra | buy cialis phentermine | cheap levitra online abused.
But the most disturbing aspect of this act, in my opinion, is that I was not aware of it until you posted your question. I did not hear this or read this on any news how buy cialis we to buy viagra without prescription buy real viagra without prescription outlet where I get my news on a daily basis. All I’ve heard about is senators’ emails, election stuff, and school shootings. It makes me wonder what other viagra buy cheapest viagra online | buy cialis with no prescription | cheap levitra generic buy viagra in san diego propecia online cialis Brand Levitra online prices crucially important levitra online price bills have been passed without me being informed of them at all.
I know it’s my responsibility as a citizen to know the levitra cheap canada laws, but it seems so difficult to get that information.
If ignorance of the law is Buy cheap ampicillin amoxicillin Antibiotics medications no excuse, then where do we go to get "un-ignorant?" Is there some kind of database or master list of the laws I’m expected to know and follow, not to mention which of buy cheap amoxil my Congresspersons weight Viagra Online loss acomplia voted for/against it, so I can use cheap buy online Amoxil buy cheap flagyl without prescription that knowledge next time I vote?
Quietly tacking onto a bill an unrelated law is an extremely deceptive and shameful practice in a supposedly free democratic society. I feel conned.
#1 by Brand X on November 16th, 2009
Quote
Per NPR, the Brits who are the current leaders in internet gambling are complaining that this was just an attempt to unfairly restrict them…to the benefit of American firms.
References :
#2 by Chris J on November 16th, 2009
Quote
I think it’s ridiculous. If you want to gamble all of your money away, you should be able to go ahead and do that. But, we’d better not see anyone try to sue an online gaming site for "allowing" them to gamble away their life savings.
References :
#3 by T-Luv on November 16th, 2009
Quote
This is common practice with law makers, I wouldn’t fret about this one. normally they attach even more ridiculous clauses to bills. Like troop funding and whatnot. If you vote against it because of what it has attached you are labeled as against the whole thing. It is quite deceptive.
References :
#4 by OrianasMom on November 16th, 2009
Quote
This legislation is a load of crap. It isn’t going to deter addicts and most sites limit how much and how often you can deposit anyway to deter that. If the US openly supported online gambling they could regulate and tax it. It would be a major source of tax revenue and I guarantee you that places like the Bellagio and MGM Grand would start online gaming websites because they know it could be a huge market. I voted for Bush, but I’m really disappointed in him on this one.
References :
#5 by LisaT on November 16th, 2009
Quote
I agree with you that this is an unnecessary and unhelpful bill. If legally prohibiting addictive behaviors was effective, then alcohol would be the least abused drug in America. Instead, it’s the most abused.
But the most disturbing aspect of this act, in my opinion, is that I was not aware of it until you posted your question. I did not hear this or read this on any news outlet where I get my news on a daily basis. All I’ve heard about is senators’ emails, election stuff, and school shootings. It makes me wonder what other crucially important bills have been passed without me being informed of them at all.
I know it’s my responsibility as a citizen to know the laws, but it seems so difficult to get that information. If ignorance of the law is no excuse, then where do we go to get "un-ignorant?" Is there some kind of database or master list of the laws I’m expected to know and follow, not to mention which of my Congresspersons voted for/against it, so I can use that knowledge next time I vote?
Quietly tacking onto a bill an unrelated law is an extremely deceptive and shameful practice in a supposedly free democratic society. I feel conned.
References :